George, I know that academic writing isn't your most favourite thing in the world, but I can't help feeling that you need to be reading more widely - and taking a bit more time to reflect - before you structure your reviews; I'd like to see you writing less generically, and maybe identifying something a bit more meaty to say about these filmic experiences. It's not that what you're writing about is 'wrong', it's rather that I don't get a sense that you're connecting with your own analysis and experience of these films. A bit more polish wouldn't go a miss either - I want to see a more serious, more scholarly George developing over the coming weeks - and I hope you're still seeing Tracey Ashmore for assistance - if you're not, then you should be!
a certain *pert* in the film?
ReplyDeleteGeorge, I know that academic writing isn't your most favourite thing in the world, but I can't help feeling that you need to be reading more widely - and taking a bit more time to reflect - before you structure your reviews; I'd like to see you writing less generically, and maybe identifying something a bit more meaty to say about these filmic experiences. It's not that what you're writing about is 'wrong', it's rather that I don't get a sense that you're connecting with your own analysis and experience of these films. A bit more polish wouldn't go a miss either - I want to see a more serious, more scholarly George developing over the coming weeks - and I hope you're still seeing Tracey Ashmore for assistance - if you're not, then you should be!